Michael Wise | May 18, 2016
My response to Scott Reid's request for guidance on how he should vote on Bill C-14.
In considering this legislation, the question before us is not whether or not one agrees with medically assisted death per se, on that, everyone is entitled to their own opinion. It is, rather, the right of the individual to participate, as the subject or as an assistant, in a medically assisted death free of interference by others.
Every person has the inherent right to seek and employ the assistance of others in terminating their own life when, in their own opinion, that life has become unbearable and they see no significant chance of their suffering being alleviated.
No person, regardless of their beliefs, has the right to prevent another from providing such assistance or to require that another do so.
The Supreme Court, in its clear and unanimous declaration of February 6, 2015, has indicated that it fully appreciates the wishes of the majority of Canadians and that it understands and supports their right to make their own decisions in this matter.
If enacted, the restrictive provisions of Bill C-14 will, on appeal, be overturned by the Supreme Court. In the interim, they would impose unnecessary and unconscionable suffering on several Canadians. This bill must not be approved. Let the unfettered ruling of the Supreme Court stand until equitable, reasonable and responsible legislation is presented to, and approved by, the parliament of Canada.
More Stories
- The Sun Shines On The Parham Fair
- Creating Your Own Weather, Forever and Ever
- Silver Lake Pow Wow Set For A Big Year
- South Frontenac Receives Substantial Provincial Grant for their Verona Housing Project
- South Frontenac Council Report - August 12
- Dumping To Be Curtailed At Loughborough Waste Site
- Central Frontenac Inching Towards Increasing Severance Opportunities
- Addington Highlands Council Report - August 12
- Addington Highlands Council Report - August 5
- Addington Highlands Council Report - August 12