![]() |
|
Feature Article - August 3, 2006
|
|
South Frontenac makes recycling deal with Kinton by Jeff Green Sometimes bad luck turns into good luck. That’s what happened for
WSI had come up with a very competitive price to win the contract, $16 per ton, and township staff began scouting around for a new contractor, hoping it would not mean a large increase in costs. Fortunately, it turned out that the City of
“The city will weigh our stuff in the various streams, plastic, glass, etc. and will sell the material directly. The selling price will be deducted from the fees we will pay. We think the price will net out at $12 per ton,” said South Frontenac Councillor Peter Roos, a member of the township’s sustainability committee, when interviewed by the News early this week. The township is responsible for trucking costs in addition to the recycling fee, but the example of Roos’ own Storrington district, where all other waste is trucked to a landfill at a price of $78 per ton plus trucking, illustrates the cost savings that come with a strong recycling program. The township also receives some money from Waste Diversion Ontario, a provincial body, based on the ratio of recycled material to material that goes into landfill. AMO pushes government on recycling policy As South Frontenac was dealing with its own recycling situation, the Association of Municipalities of Ontario released a position paper entitled “Improving the efficiency of the Blue Box program”. A major focus of the report is coloured glass, which is costly to handle, has little or no market value, and is sold mostly by one large retailer, the government owned Liquor Control Board of Ontario (LCBO). Of the 75,000 total tonnage of coloured glass bottles sold annually in the province, 66,200 tons are sold by the LCBO. The report goes on to say that in the latest year for which information is available, 2003, “The wine and spirit bottling industry paid over $50 million in the form of a ten cent ‘environmental levy’ for each bottle of wine or spirits they bottled in
The position paper recommends that the LCBO be directed to establish a deposit-refund system for alcoholic beverages, and that all or a portion of the $50 million collected from bottlers be used to set up the system. This, along with other recommendations, is designed to make recycling programs more cost effective for municipalities, in the hopes that municipalities will redouble their efforts to encourage recycling by ratepayers who will benefit through lower municipal taxes. Waste management costs have been increasing dramatically in rural
|
|